Formnext 2024 Frankfurt – New manufacturing methods for bikes and components

This article contains footnotes. It serves as an introduction and overview. If you are not familiar with certain terms or would like to find out the background to them, you will find it here (*1–*9).

Reading time: 12 minutes

🇩🇪 Deutsche Version lesen

While we have become accustomed to smooth carbon frames without weld seams, there is recently increasing variability in frame materials and manufacturing methods. Materials that had disappeared into niche markets are now coming back into the spotlight. Titanium and steel are experiencing a renaissance, not only as standalone materials but also in combination with carbon. Lugged frames and dreams of titanium and steel, reminiscent of the 80s and 90s, are drawing people to events like the Craft Bike Days. Trek presented a concept bike with a steel front triangle designed by industrial designer Kyle Neuser, Neko Mulally showcases every step of development live in the World Cup with Frameworks, Thadeus Tisch has also introduced a privately developed steel bike, and Atherton… Yes, Atherton has almost become "normal," with their combination of titanium lugs and carbon tubes. Anyone who closely follows the mountain bike scene will easily be able to identify a list of tinkerers, small and micro-manufacturers, numbering in the mid-double digits. So, why is this so remarkable right now?

After the COVID hiatus, there has been a resurgence of activity in the bike industry. Some manufacturing processes, which automakers have been considering for much longer, are suddenly becoming feasible for small-scale production. The doors to the possibilities of manufacturing a frame or a component have been kicked wide open. Fresh ideas in the bike industry are emerging and are ready to compete with established brands. At the Formnext trade fair in Frankfurt, the focus was on the latest technologies in the field of additive manufacturing methods. What most people colloquially refer to as "3D printing" is, upon closer inspection, much more complex and multi-layered (pun intended). Take a bit of time and dive into an overview of both old and new manufacturing methods, and how the combination of both will influence our beloved bicycles.

Entering the first hall, you were greeted by life-sized replicas/prints of Gundam, Ironman, and the latest characters from films and streaming series. The cosplay scene has long understood the potential of 3D printing for cost-effective realization in the hobby workshop. While these applications may seem far removed from bikes at first, one should not immediately dismiss these stands and walk past them. The demands on miniatures—not just from the 40K universe—are extremely high. Details like faces, armor, and/or pre-formed printed joints on miniatures are expected to be achievable. These requirements far exceed those of a bicycle frame, yet they are still relevant—not just in the field of prototyping.

The current highest resolution for resin printers (3D printers that use photopolymer resin) is strongly dependent on the technology used and the model of the printer. By 2024, there are already several high-resolution printers on the market offering exceptional detail accuracy.

Specifically, this means that resin printers (*1) can achieve up to 8K resolution in the XY-plane (with 16K on the horizon), and in the Z-axis, the layer height can be as fine as 0.005 mm (5 µm). (*2)

While these technologies are still primarily used in dental and other medical applications, they could become highly relevant for bikes, especially when considering hydraulic braking and suspension technology. Why exactly? More on that later, when we dive into the rapidly evolving resolutions of these systems.

3D-printing in the bike-industry

Filament – printed from the thread

Even today, bicycle development departments proudly showcase their 3D printers. These are often equipped with filament (*3) made of PLA (Polylactic Acid). As a result, the parts produced tend to appear relatively rough. The requirements for such prototypes don't focus on the best surface quality; rather, it's about quick prototyping. It's also important to realize that these examples represent just the tiniest tip of the iceberg when it comes to additive manufacturing. Other filaments allow for entirely different properties in the final part. For example, a chain guide or a pedal body would be printed with a material that has significantly higher impact resistance. What's exciting about this is that, in some cases, it can be realized on the same printer. There are many more variants of filaments, and while this raw material is constantly evolving, there are also various combinations that offer different properties.

What's particularly exciting is the direction of metal. Metal filament is also printed from spools. After printing, the part undergoes a heat treatment to burn out the binder material and achieve strength through sintering (*4). Filaments are continuously being developed and are capable of meeting a wide range of requirements. Smaller applications can already be found in items like mounts for Garmin devices, water bottles, tools, lamps, AirTag holders, and more. Printers for this material are quite affordable, with prices starting in the low hundreds of euros, making it accessible for cost-effective DIY projects in the hobby workshop. However, when it comes to dimensional accuracy, they lag the potential of other methods somewhat.

PLA filament is probably the most well-known base material. (Photo: Extrudr)

Resin – from liquid to solid object

When it comes to detail accuracy and precision, this technique has the lead. Unlike with filament, the workpiece is not melted, but rather cured. In this process, a laser focuses on a specific point in space or within a liquid. The so-called resin comes in various forms (*5), similar to filament. In the bike industry, we already have a range of products that are manufactured using this method.

Specialized, for example, uses a 3D-printed matrix for their so-called Mirror saddles, which can only be made with this technology. Together with features like carbon rails and a carbon base, this allows for product characteristics that offer greater comfort and precisely aligned functionality. But it doesn’t always have to be rubber-like or flexible. There are options for transparent resin and resin containing metal. This method can become expensive, but it can also create parts of such quality that they could easily be sold in the mass market. However, it is important to note in the bike industry that the cost per piece can be relatively high due to the cost of resin and printing time. If design is not specifically reliant on this method, it might make more sense to opt for other processes, such as injection molding (*6).

Bike grips, saddle shells, small parts, and even die-cast (*7) aluminum pedal bodies have become indispensable in the bike world. Since this method is already well-established, we won’t go into it in more detail here.

HeyGears offers resin for a wide range of applications, from dental to transparent and extra-durable parts.

PASTE – Laminated Object Manufacturing

Workpieces come with a wide variety of requirements, and these can be achieved through numerous manufacturing techniques. Forging, CNC milling, and laminating are just a few methods, but one particularly interesting process is Laminated Object Manufacturing (LOM). This method involves applying metal paste to a workpiece carrier and processing it in multiple layers, and it has proven especially useful for creating complex, dense metal components.

The LOM process starts with the application of a thin layer of metal paste onto the surface of a workpiece carrier. This paste is composed of metal particles suspended in a binder. Once the paste is applied, the layer is then heated in an oven or subjected to another sintering mechanism. The heat causes the metal particles to bond together, and as a result, the paste hardens into a solid layer. Once the first layer is hardened, another layer of metal paste is applied on top and sintered again. This process is repeated, layer by layer, until the final component is fully formed.

This layer-by-layer approach allows for the creation of thicker parts with high material density, which is one of the key advantages of LOM over other 3D printing methods. Unlike some other techniques, LOM can produce metal parts that are not just detailed, but also have a high structural integrity due to their density. This makes it especially well-suited for prototyping or producing small batches of high-performance parts, such as those used in the automotive or aerospace industries. For instance, the method could be used to create a durable component like a bike frame part or a highly intricate bracket that requires both strength and precision, but also has complex geometries that would be difficult to achieve with traditional manufacturing methods like casting or forging.

One of the significant benefits of LOM lies in its ability to bypass traditional, labor-intensive manufacturing processes like CNC machining or metal casting. While these methods often require expensive tooling, large-scale machinery, and a considerable amount of time, LOM allows you to produce metal components more efficiently and at a lower cost. For example, in the context of bicycle manufacturing, where parts like pedal bodies or frame components might require high precision and strength, LOM offers a cost-effective solution for creating prototypes or small production runs without the need for expensive molds or machining tools.

Moreover, LOM is particularly advantageous when dealing with parts that need to have uniform density and material properties throughout, as the sintering process ensures that the metal particles are thoroughly bonded and the final piece has consistent strength across its entire structure. This is crucial in applications where strength-to-weight ratios are important, as it ensures that the part performs as expected stressed and strain. For example, a high-performance bike part made using LOM would have the strength to endure the stresses of mountain biking or road racing, but would also benefit from reduced weight compared to traditionally machined parts.

However, one limitation of LOM is its relatively slow processing time, especially for larger components, since each layer must be carefully sintered. This can make it less suitable for mass production compared to other methods like injection molding (6). Yet, for specialized, high-density parts that require precision, LOM remains a valuable option.

Powder – Laser turns soft into solid

Unlike the other methods mentioned, this process uses a powder as the base material. Later, we'll delve deeper into this technique and how Atherton Bikes applies it with titanium. However, steel and other metals are also possible. Similar to the resin process, a precisely focused laser sinters the powder. After each layer is completed, the next layer of powder is applied, and the laser starts to fuse the new layer, continuing in this manner until the final component is built.

The advantage of this method is the ability to form complex structures within hollow bodies that would be impossible with subtractive manufacturing methods. Depending on the surface requirements, additional post-processing steps like CNC machining may be necessary to add contact and mounting points for a headset, bearings or threads.

The orientation of the workpiece within the machine plays a crucial role. Support structures are sometimes required to ensure shape stability during the printing process. The temperature during the laser sintering process is also important, and companies like Trumpf and Renishaw are continuously working on optimizing pre-print simulations to avoid unwanted results and ensure the part meets the required specifications before it leaves the machine.

Atherton Bikes uses titanium powder in this process. After printing, bearing seats are further processed using CNC machining to ensure precise fit and surface quality.

While titanium is relatively expensive as a material, there are also more affordable options like steel and aluminum. However, parts made from sintered aluminum and steel powder are not yet relevant for mass production of bicycles and components. For most parts, traditional forged components (*9) are more cost-effective and offer better material properties right off the production line.

That said, it's worth keeping an eye on smaller manufacturers, enthusiasts, and makers of concept bikes. As mentioned earlier, there is a renewed fascination with aluminum, steel, and titanium in the core mountain bike scene. For individualists, these bikes present an exciting alternative to what the big brands offer in carbon frames. Even though the new metal frames are often heavier, they bring ride qualities that should not be overlooked.

Carbon, through careful planning of the frame shape, number of layers, fiber material and fiber orientation, can have a significant influence on ride characteristics. When you compare the frequencies and flex properties of carbon with those of a steel frame, things get interesting. While steel and titanium have historically been known for being more forgiving and easier on the rider due to their flexibility, reducing this down to just these characteristics oversimplifies the matter.

Few of us have had the privilege of riding two frames with identical geometry, made from two different materials. Some might have had the chance to ride two bikes from the same category (e.g., Enduro or All-Mountain) but from different brands. Generally, it's clear that differences are already noticeable when comparing two different carbon frames on the trail. Each brand interprets the handling characteristics of their bikes in their own way. The differences become even more pronounced when switching from carbon to steel. While some riders greatly appreciate the flex of steel, others might be confused by the handling when cornering or riding over roots and bumps. Steel tends to twist more than carbon, and that can bring both advantages and drawbacks.

This trend is now being showcased by Trek with the concept bike designed by industrial designer Kyle Neuser. He created a steel version of the TopFuel.

Sleek, slim, elegant. (Photo: Trek)

As mountain bikers, we don't just want to see what the big manufacturers come up with when they jump on the bandwagon. We want to see the truly new ideas. What unites us is our passion for the tinkerers, the ones who think completely outside the box and have the heart and soul to bring those ideas to life on a bike. Thadeus Tisch (Instagram: @thadeustisch), who works for Norco in his day job, has brought his vision of a steel park bike to life. It's best to quote him directly here:

This is my home made Singlespeed Park Bike. It is rather short travel with 160mm/R  and 170mm/F and made from 3D printed 309L parts and CrMo tubes. The main goal as always is to make the bike as silent as possible, so for a singlespeed drivetrain the belt drive was an obvious choice. Some parts are still placeholders and I don’t have a weight yet.
— Thadeus Tisch

In the end, such a bike often ends up costing about as much as an off-the-shelf model. The question of pure financial sense doesn’t really arise. After all, you also have to invest your evenings and weekends. The simple truth is that these bikes don't exist on the market, and with new manufacturing possibilities, the threshold to embark on such a project has been significantly lowered.

Thadeus used 3D-printed steel parts for the complex components of his concept bike. He then welded these himself to the remaining steel tubes. (Photos: Thadeus Tisch)

Not only from a manufacturing perspective, this is a fascinating project. (Photo: Thadeus Tisch)

Lugged frames? Old-school or new-school?

In 2013, something began in Monmouth with Robot-Bikes that initially sounded like science fiction with a retro twist. Former Dirt Magazine editor Ed Haythornthwaite, Andy Hawkins, and Ben Robarts-Arnold had a vision. They wanted to transfer futuristic manufacturing techniques from the aerospace industry to bicycles.

Connecting tubes with lugs is almost as old as cycling itself. Whether it was on soldered racing bike frames around 1880 by Alexandre Leduc, the lugged vision of the future by Kestrel in the late 1980s, or later in 1998 with the GT DH Lobo, the technique has a rich history. Anyone who hasn't seen it all should be ready to dive deep into the rabbit hole of cycling history for a few hours.

Robot-Bikes became Atherton Bikes in 2018. Rachel, Gee, and Dan Atherton took the possibilities of additive manufacturing with titanium lugs "printed" on Renishaw machines to the next level, expanding their portfolio to include a pure yet also lugged aluminum bike. The "A Range" refers to the "additive bikes" (printed), while the "S" range covers the "subtractive" ones (CNC-milled).

The concept of lugging tubes seems to be catching on. It makes prototyping a bike frame significantly more affordable, as the overall effort is reduced. With the option to use less expensive powders like steel—and its growing popularity among smaller companies and tinkerers—it’s also possible to completely forgo carbon. Printed metal parts can be welded to regular tubes. A print process also requires a so-called pre-stage, where the file is prepared for the printer. However, this stage is generally less complex than preparing it for a CNC machine.

Atherton combines CNC-machined aluminum parts with aluminum tubes or 3D-printed titanium lugs with carbon tubes. (Photo: Atherton-Bikes)

Finite-Elemente – Reduced to the max

When you consider selective laser sintering and combine it with finite element software (*8), entirely new shapes and possibilities emerge. At Formnext, highly optimized vehicle components, race drone frames, and even bicycle pedals were on display. The software performs complex physical calculations that influence the shape of the component. This was impressively demonstrated at the trade show, whether for rocket engines or mountain bikes.

What's particularly exciting is the fact that the shapes are completely organic, highlighting parallels to biomechanics.

It's no coincidence that these components resemble bone structures. Both are highly optimized for a ratio of weight to strength.

Why is biomechanics so exciting for bicycles?

Every living organism has certain physical abilities that are adapted to its specific habitat. These abilities solve problems through mechanics. In simpler terms: the mechanical properties of bones, muscles, tendons, and ligaments must be understood thoroughly and incorporated into finite element models. Nature has managed to "build" highly optimized structures. Depending on the direction of stress, these structures have different mechanical properties and respond to loads in varying ways.

In biomechanical research, the specific material properties of these tissues, such as tensile strength or bending stiffness, are studied, and the data gathered is directly incorporated into FE calculations. By removing material where the loads are lower and adding material where higher forces are at play, bone-like shapes emerge.

Not a gram too much and not a gram too little. Weight-optimized for the intended purpose. Exactly what we are constantly searching for in bike development.

An example of when optimization through FE is taken to the extreme. Will bikes soon look like this?

What does this mean for the future of bicycle development?

The combination of technologies such as biomechanics, finite element calculations, additive manufacturing, and the development of new materials will significantly impact the functionality and appearance of bikes and components.

By using FE calculations, bikes can be precisely and individually tailored to the physical and riding requirements of users, optimizing frame geometries and load distribution.

At the same time, additive manufacturing enables the creation of complex, lightweight, and functional structures that would not be possible with traditional manufacturing methods. Materials like carbon fibers or metal matrix composites generate lighter and simultaneously stronger components.

Overall, the integration of all these technologies will lead to lighter, more efficient, and more ergonomic bicycles. Bikes will become more efficient while simultaneously improving comfort and safety.

Welcome to the future, and it’s happening right before our eyes.

Appendix Links

 

Author – Jens Staudt

Height: 191 cm

Weight: 200 lbs (incl ride gear)

Riding style: With his racing background, the lines are planned, even if there is anything bigger in his way. If possible, sections will be jumped over. You should use the entire width of a trail. Others would say - uncompromising.

Motivation: A product should function carefree and for as long as possible. If you have to screw less, you can ride more. He likes to tinker and see how the bike can be optimized.


Zurück
Zurück

Podcast: Paul Aston – Pushing Geometry and reliability of bikes

Weiter
Weiter

Formnext 2024 Frankfurt – Neue Fertigungsmethoden für Bikes und Komponenten